Bruce v. Chaiken et al

Filing 26

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/4/15 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 10/21/15 24 are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's MOTION Requesting that CDCR calculate his filing fees sequentially 14 is STAYED pending resolution of his issue by the United States Supreme Court. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

VINCENT BRUCE,

12
13
14

No. 2:15-cv-0960 TLN KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

SHAMA CHAIKEN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On October 21, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.

24

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:

27

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 21, 2015, are adopted in full;

28

2. Plaintiff’s motion requesting that CDCR calculate his filing fees sequentially (ECF No.
1

1

14) is stayed pending resolution of this issue by the United States Supreme Court.

2

Dated: December 4, 2015

3
4
5
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2