Bruce v. Chaiken et al
Filing
97
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/14/2018 VACATING 96 Order and GRANTING 95 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is GRANTED 14 days from the date of this order to file objections to the 91 Findings and Recommendations. (Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
VINCENT C. BRUCE,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-0960-TLN-KJN
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
SHAMA CHAIKEN, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is Plaintiff’s second motion for extension of time
19
to file objections to the August 31, 2018, findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 95.)
20
Pursuant to the mailbox rule, Plaintiff filed this motion on October 29, 2018, though this Court
21
did not have notice of the filing until November 5, 2018. (ECF No. 95.)
22
On September 28, 2018, Magistrate Judge Newman granted Plaintiff a thirty-day
23
extension of time to file objections. (ECF No. 94.) Thirty days passed and Plaintiff did not file
24
objections. On November 7, 2018, this Court adopted the findings and recommendations. (ECF
25
No. 96.) This Court was not aware of Plaintiff’s second motion for extension of time to file
26
objections when the November 7, 2018, order issued.
27
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
28
1. The November 7, 2018 order is vacated;
1
1
2
3
2. Plaintiff’s second motion for extension of time to file objections (ECF No. 95) is
granted;
3. Plaintiff is granted fourteen days from the date of this order to file objections to the
4
August 31, 2018, findings and recommendations; no further requests for extension of time to file
5
objections will be granted.
6
7
Dated: November 14, 2018
8
9
10
11
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?