Nichols v. Stewart Title of Placer et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/6/2015 GRANTING defendant's 9 Ex Parte Application for extension of time. Stewart Title Guaranty Company shall have until 7/21/2015 to answer or otherwise plead in response to 1 Complaint. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Nicole M. Ryan (SBN 175980) nicole.ryan@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 California Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 772-1200 Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 Attorneys for Defendant STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 TIFFANY NICHOLS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and in the Interest of the General Public of the State of California, Plaintiffs, vs. STEWART TITLE OF PLACER, a California corporation, STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation, RACHEL SIDERS, LEAH ISOM, and Does 1-50 inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-CV-00977-TLN-AC Assigned to: Hon. Troy L. Nunley ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER RE: EX PARTE APP. TO EXT. TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00977-TLN-AC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Good causing appearing, the ex parte application of Defendant Stewart Title Guaranty Company for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint is hereby granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Stewart Title Guaranty Company shall have until July 21, 2015 to answer or otherwise plead in response to the Complaint. Dated: July 6, 2015 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER RE: EX PARTE APP. TO EXT. TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT – CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00977-TLN-AC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?