Owens v. Clark et al

Filing 78

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/27/18 ADOPTING in full 76 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and GRANTING in PART and DENYING in part 67 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants Zink, DiTomas, Clark, and Harris are GRANTED summary judgment. This action is REMANDED to the assigned magistrate judge for further scheduling. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DERRICK OWENS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-0982-TLN-KJN v. ORDER JACKIE CLARK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 27, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections 23 to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 27, 2018, are ADOPTED in full; and 3 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 67) is GRANTED in part, and 4 DENIED in part, as follows: 5 a. Dr. Ko’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED on Plaintiff’s claim that the 6 prescription of alternative pain medication was delayed once the morphine washed out of his 7 system or Plaintiff informed Dr. Ko of Plaintiff’s need for alternative medications; 8 b. Dr. Ko’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED on all other grounds; 9 c. Defendants Zink, DiTomas, Clark, and Harris are GRANTED summary 10 11 judgment; and d. This action is remanded to the assigned magistrate judge for further scheduling. 12 13 Dated: September 27, 2018 14 15 16 17 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?