Ehringer v. State of California

Filing 28

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/22/16 ORDERING that plaintiff show cause within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ.P. 41(b). (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ORION S. EHRINGER,

12
13
14

No. 2:15-cv-00985-KJM-AC

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

15

Defendant.

16
17
18

On March 1, 2016, the magistrate judge recommended dismissal of plaintiff’s first

19

amended complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) and

20

granted thirty days for plaintiff to file a second amended complaint. ECF No. 24 at 10. This

21

court adopted the magistrate court’s findings and recommendations on March 29, 2016. ECF No.

22

26. To date, plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or taken further action to

23

complete litigation of this case.

24

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff show cause within fourteen (14) days of the

25

date of this order why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ.

26

P. 41(b).

27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 22, 2016
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE