Beecham et al v. Roseville City School District et al
Filing
139
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/22/2017 ORDERING that all dispositive motions be filed by 9/22/2017; VACATING the Final Pretrial Conference, Jury Trial, and the deadlines for the final joint pretrial conference statement and trial briefs; ORDERING that no other portion of the 27 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order be altered. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
14
DUANE BEECHAM, KIMBERLY
BEECHAM, S.Y.B., a minor by and
through her co-guardians ad litem DUANE
BEECHAM and KIMBERLY BEECHAM;
OLIVER VERGARA, JENNIFER
VERGARA, E.V., a minor by and through
his co-guardians ad litem OLIVER
VERGARA and JENNIFER VERGARA,
17
18
19
FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER
Plaintiffs,
15
16
No. 2:15-CV-01022-KJM-EFB
v.
ROSEVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
THERESA VAN WAGNER, GEORGE
ROOKS, JERROLD JORGENSEN, and
DOES 1 – 30,
Defendants.
20
21
Defendants have filed ex parte applications (ECF Nos. 131–32) to amend dates in
22
the pretrial scheduling order (ECF No. 27), which plaintiffs oppose (ECF No. 133). Good cause
23
appearing, the court GRANTS this request in part, as follows:
24
25
26
Description
All Dispositive Motions
File Joint Pretrial Conference Statement
Existing Date
June 23, 2017
August 31, 2017
27
28
1
New Date
September 22, 2017
VACATED. To be set
after court resolves any
dispositive motions.
1
Final Pretrial Conference
September 22, 2017
Trial Briefs Due
November 13, 2017
Trial
November 26, 2017
2
3
4
5
6
VACATED. To be set
after court resolves any
dispositive motions.
VACATED. To be set
after court resolves any
dispositive motions.
VACATED. To be set
after court resolves any
dispositive motions.
7
8
9
10
This amendment does not alter any other portions of the initial scheduling order (ECF No. 27).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 22, 2017.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?