California Sportfishing Protecting Alliance v. Beard

Filing 7

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/10/2015 ORDERING that the this matter, which was previously stayed for all purposes, except for settlement negotiations and related activities, will continue to be stayed for an additional two (2) months from the date of the Court's order. CASE STAYED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Michael R. Lozeau (Bar No. 142893) Douglas J. Chermak (Bar No. 233382) LOZEAU DRURY LLP 410 12th Street, Suite 250 Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: 510.836.4200 Facsimile: 510.836.4205 E-mail: Doug@lozeaudrury.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Andrew L. Packard (State Bar No. 168690) Megan E. Truxillo (State Bar No. 275746) LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD 100 Petaluma Blvd. N., Suite 301 Petaluma, CA 94952 Tel: (707) 763-7227 Fax: (707) 763-9227 E-mail: Andrew@PackardLawOffices.com Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE Downey Brand LLP MELISSA A THORME (Bar No. 151278) ROBERT P. SORAN (Bar No. 169577) 621 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814-4731 Telephone: 916.444.1000 Facsimile: 916.444.2100 mthorme@downeybrand.com rsoran@downeybrand.com Attorneys for Defendant JEFFREY BEARD, in his official capacity 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation, 23 24 25 26 27 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:15-CV-01027-TLN-EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUED STAY v. JEFFEY BEARD, in his official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, (Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. §§1251 to 1387) Defendant. 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUED STAY 1 Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (“CSPA”) and Defendant Jeffrey 2 Beard, in his official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and 3 Rehabilitation (“Beard”) (collectively “Parties”), previously filed a stipulation and request that 4 the Court continue its May 12, 2015, order (filed on May 12, 2015 as Document No. 3) and stay 5 all proceedings in this case temporarily. The Parties so stipulated to conserve their resources 6 pending ongoing settlement negotiations to address the allegations contained in the Complaint. 7 The Court granted this stipulation on June 1, 2015. 8 9 In order to continue on-going settlement negotiations, and without waiving any rights, claims, or defenses the Parties may have as of the date of this stipulation, the Parties agree and 10 request that the above-captioned matter is stayed for all purposes for an additional two (2) months 11 from the date of the Court’s order approving this continued stay. As before, this stay may be 12 requested to be extended by stipulation or motion if settlement is not completed within 2 months. 13 The Parties also agree, subject to Court approval, to continue the deadlines for all filings 14 and/or requirements in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules related to or 15 triggered by the service of the Complaint, if any, to new dates set after the expiration of this stay. 16 Respectfully submitted, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUED STAY 1 2 DATED: August 10, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD 3 By: 4 /s/ Megan E. Truxillo MEGAN E. TRUXILLO Attorney for Plaintiff 5 6 7 DATED: August 7, 2015 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 8 By: 9 /s/ Melissa A. Thorme MELISSA A. THORME Attorney for Defendant 10 11 12 13 ORDER 14 Pursuant to the above Stipulation of the Parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 15 above captioned matter (Case No. 2:15-CV-01027-TLN-EFB), which was previously stayed for 16 all purposes, except for settlement negotiations and related activities, will continue to be stayed 17 for an additional two (2) months from the date of the Court’s order. 18 19 Dated: August 10, 2015 20 21 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUED STAY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?