California Sportfishing Protecting Alliance v. Beard
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/10/2015 ORDERING that the this matter, which was previously stayed for all purposes, except for settlement negotiations and related activities, will continue to be stayed for an additional two (2) months from the date of the Court's order. CASE STAYED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
Michael R. Lozeau (Bar No. 142893)
Douglas J. Chermak (Bar No. 233382)
LOZEAU DRURY LLP
410 12th Street, Suite 250
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone:
510.836.4200
Facsimile:
510.836.4205
E-mail: Doug@lozeaudrury.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Andrew L. Packard (State Bar No. 168690)
Megan E. Truxillo (State Bar No. 275746)
LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD
100 Petaluma Blvd. N., Suite 301
Petaluma, CA 94952
Tel: (707) 763-7227
Fax: (707) 763-9227
E-mail: Andrew@PackardLawOffices.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA
SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE
Downey Brand LLP
MELISSA A THORME (Bar No. 151278)
ROBERT P. SORAN (Bar No. 169577)
621 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814-4731
Telephone:
916.444.1000
Facsimile:
916.444.2100
mthorme@downeybrand.com
rsoran@downeybrand.com
Attorneys for Defendant
JEFFREY BEARD, in his official capacity
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE,
a non-profit corporation,
23
24
25
26
27
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:15-CV-01027-TLN-EFB
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
CONTINUED STAY
v.
JEFFEY BEARD, in his official capacity
as Secretary of the California Department
of Corrections and Rehabilitation,
(Federal Water Pollution Control Act,
33 U.S.C. §§1251 to 1387)
Defendant.
28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUED STAY
1
Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (“CSPA”) and Defendant Jeffrey
2
Beard, in his official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and
3
Rehabilitation (“Beard”) (collectively “Parties”), previously filed a stipulation and request that
4
the Court continue its May 12, 2015, order (filed on May 12, 2015 as Document No. 3) and stay
5
all proceedings in this case temporarily. The Parties so stipulated to conserve their resources
6
pending ongoing settlement negotiations to address the allegations contained in the Complaint.
7
The Court granted this stipulation on June 1, 2015.
8
9
In order to continue on-going settlement negotiations, and without waiving any rights,
claims, or defenses the Parties may have as of the date of this stipulation, the Parties agree and
10
request that the above-captioned matter is stayed for all purposes for an additional two (2) months
11
from the date of the Court’s order approving this continued stay. As before, this stay may be
12
requested to be extended by stipulation or motion if settlement is not completed within 2 months.
13
The Parties also agree, subject to Court approval, to continue the deadlines for all filings
14
and/or requirements in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules related to or
15
triggered by the service of the Complaint, if any, to new dates set after the expiration of this stay.
16
Respectfully submitted,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUED STAY
1
2
DATED: August 10, 2015
LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD
3
By:
4
/s/ Megan E. Truxillo
MEGAN E. TRUXILLO
Attorney for Plaintiff
5
6
7
DATED: August 7, 2015
DOWNEY BRAND LLP
8
By:
9
/s/ Melissa A. Thorme
MELISSA A. THORME
Attorney for Defendant
10
11
12
13
ORDER
14
Pursuant to the above Stipulation of the Parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
15
above captioned matter (Case No. 2:15-CV-01027-TLN-EFB), which was previously stayed for
16
all purposes, except for settlement negotiations and related activities, will continue to be stayed
17
for an additional two (2) months from the date of the Court’s order.
18
19
Dated: August 10, 2015
20
21
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUED STAY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?