Mitchell v. Tseng, et al.
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/6/2017 DENYING plaintiff's 17 , 18 motions to waive the remainder of the filing fee. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RANDY DALE MITCHELL,
12
No. 2:15-cv-1029 GEB AC P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
S. TSENG, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
By order filed May 13, 2016, the complaint in this action was dismissed without leave to
18
amend because it failed to state a claim. ECF Nos. 12, 15. Plaintiff has now filed two motions
19
requesting that the court order the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to
20
stop withdrawing money for the filing fee from his trust account. ECF Nos. 17, 18. He asserts
21
that after his health issues worsened, he filed a motion to withdraw the complaint that has never
22
been addressed. Id.
23
The court never received a motion to withdraw in this case, and while the court is
24
sympathetic to plaintiff’s health issues, he chose to initiate this case and the court was required to
25
spend time obtaining his in forma pauperis application and screening the complaint. ECF Nos. 6,
26
9, 12. Plaintiff fails to specify when the motion was sent so that the court can determine whether,
27
had it been received, it would have been received prior to screening the complaint. Finally,
28
plaintiff is not relieved of his obligation to pay the filing fee simply because he decided he no
1
1
2
longer wanted to pursue this action.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions to waive the remainder
3
of the filing fee (ECF Nos. 17, 18) are denied.
4
DATED: September 6, 2017
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?