Bennett v. Fisher

Filing 3

ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California; Old case number 1:15-cv-00708 SMS (HC), signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 05/12/2015. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 1:15-cv-00708 SMS (HC) BENJAMIN BENNETT, Petitioner, ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA v. R. FISHER, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 19 20 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 2254. The petitioner is challenging a conviction from Tehama County, which is part of the 21 Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. 22 Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the Sacramento Division. 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper 24 court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action 25 will be transferred to the Sacramento Division. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Sacramento; and 1 1 2 2. All future filings shall reference the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 12, 2015 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?