Yegorov v. Kramer
Filing
4
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/24/15 Recommending that this Action be dismissed re 1 Complaint. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to these F&R due within fourteen days.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DIMITRIY YEGOROV,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-1042 TLN GGH PS
Plaintiff,
v.
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
PAUL KRAMER,
Defendant.
16
17
By order filed July 14, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight days
18
leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff of the
19
deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not
20
filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
21
Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the reasons given
22
in the July 14, 2015, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with
23
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
24
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
25
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
26
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
27
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
28
and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the
1
1
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951
2
F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: August 24, 2015
4
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
5
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
GGH:076/Yegorov1042.fta
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?