Peel v. Unknown

Filing 7

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/26/15 ORDERING that the clerk of the court assign a district court judge to this case; and it is RECOMMENEDED that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONALD PEEL, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-1052 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND UNKNOWN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 17 By an order filed May 18, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma 18 pauperis application within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a 19 recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and 20 plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed a completed application. 21 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the court assign a district court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENEDED that this action be dismissed. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 28 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 1 1 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 2 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: June 26, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 peel1052.fifp 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?