Peel v. Unknown

Filing 7

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/26/15 ORDERING that the clerk of the court assign a district court judge to this case; and it is RECOMMENEDED that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DONALD PEEL,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-1052 CKD P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER AND

UNKNOWN,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.

16
17

By an order filed May 18, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma

18

pauperis application within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a

19

recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and

20

plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed a completed application.

21
22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the court assign a district court
judge to this case; and

23

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENEDED that this action be dismissed.

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

27

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

28

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
1

1

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

2

(9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: June 26, 2015

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9

1
peel1052.fifp

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2