Williams v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/3/15 ORDERING that plaintiff's request for assistance from the United States Marshal (ECF No. 11 ) is denied.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN W. WILLIAMS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-1057-JAM-EFB P
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action. Plaintiff, who has paid
19
the filing fee, requests assistance from the United States Marshal in effecting service of process
20
on defendants.
Rule 4(c)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that “[a]t the plaintiff’s request,
21
22
the court may order that service be made by a United States marshal or deputy marshal or by a
23
person specially appointed by the court.” The Advisory Notes to the Rule indicate that the court
24
retains this discretion in the event that “a law enforcement presence appears to be necessary or
25
advisable to keep the peace . . . .” Rule 4, Advisory Committee Notes, 1993 Amendments. Here,
26
there is no apparent need for law enforcement to effect service of process in order to keep the
27
peace, and plaintiff’s request must therefore be denied.
28
/////
1
1
Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis, and it is his responsibility to arrange for
2
service of process on defendants. The court is mindful that plaintiff’s incarceration presents
3
obstacles in retaining a process server, but it remains plaintiff’s responsibility to arrange for
4
service of process.
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for assistance from the
6
United States Marshal (ECF No. 11) is denied. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to accomplish
7
service within the time prescribed by Rule 4(m) may result in a this action being dismissed for
8
failure to follow court orders, for failure to effect service of process, and/or for lack of
9
prosecution under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
10
DATED: August 3, 2015.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?