Windham v. California Medical Facility, et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/11/16 denying 23 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice to plaintiff filing a motion for summary judgment that complies with the requirements of Rule 56. (Plummer, M)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAMUEL WINDHAM, JR.,
No. 2:15-cv-1058 MCE CKD P
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et
Plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment. However, plaintiff has failed to
comply with the requirements of Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Most notably,
plaintiff has failed to show, or attempt to show, that “there is no genuine dispute as to any
material facts and that [plaintiff] is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Accordingly,
plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 23) is denied without prejudice to plaintiff
filing a motion for summary judgment that complies with the requirements of Rule 56.
Dated: March 11, 2016
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?