Windham v. California Medical Facility, et al

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/11/16 denying 23 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice to plaintiff filing a motion for summary judgment that complies with the requirements of Rule 56. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SAMUEL WINDHAM, JR.,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-1058 MCE CKD P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et
al.,

16

Defendants.

17
18

Plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment. However, plaintiff has failed to

19

comply with the requirements of Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Most notably,

20

plaintiff has failed to show, or attempt to show, that “there is no genuine dispute as to any

21

material facts and that [plaintiff] is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Accordingly,

22

plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 23) is denied without prejudice to plaintiff

23

filing a motion for summary judgment that complies with the requirements of Rule 56.

24

Dated: March 11, 2016

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28

1
wind1058.msj