Windham v. California Medical Facility, et al
Filing
65
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/25/17 recommending that plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief 51 be denied. Motion for Preliminary Injunction 51 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SAMUEL WINDHAM, JR.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-1058 MCE CKD P
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et
al.,
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil action. Plaintiff has filed a
17
18
motion for preliminary injunctive relief concerning his current medical care at the California
19
Health Care Facility in Stockton. However, the two remaining defendants in this action,
20
defendants Sabin and Yun, were medical professionals at the California Medical Facility (CMF)
21
in Vacaville during all times relevant to the allegations in plaintiff’s operative first amended
22
complaint. Also, plaintiff does not seek injunctive relief in his first amended complaint, only
23
damages against Sabin and Yun concerning past care for plaintiff at CMF. In light of the
24
foregoing, the court will recommend that plaintiff’s request for preliminary injunctive relief be
25
denied. Plaintiff has the option of initiating a separate civil action if he wishes to challenge his
26
current conditions of confinement at the California Health Care Facility.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s motion for preliminary
injunctive relief (ECF No. 51) be denied.
3
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
4
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
5
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
6
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
7
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
8
objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
9
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
10
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
11
Dated: May 25, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
1
wind1058.msj
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?