Miller v. People of the State of California, Sacramento County

Filing 4

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Eastern District of California. Signed by Judge Nandor Vadas on 5/13/2015. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2015) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/13/2015: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (njvlc1, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from cand on 5/15/2015.]

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 EUREKA DIVISION 6 7 RICHARD D. MILLER, Jr., Petitioner, 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 No. C 15-2120 NJV (PR) vs. ORDER OF TRANSFER PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent. / 13 14 This is a habeas case filed pro se by a state prisoner. Petitioner seeks to challenge 15 a conviction obtained in the Sacramento County Superior Court. Sacramento County is in 16 the venue of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Petitioner 17 is incarcerated in Oklahoma. 18 Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district 19 of conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); this district is neither. Because petitions challenging a 20 conviction are preferably heard in the district of conviction, Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Laue v. 21 Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968), and petitioner was convicted in the 22 Eastern District, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the 23 Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b). 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 13, 2015. NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?