Miller v. People of the State of California, Sacramento County
Filing
4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Eastern District of California. Signed by Judge Nandor Vadas on 5/13/2015. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2015) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/13/2015: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (njvlc1, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from cand on 5/15/2015.]
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
EUREKA DIVISION
6
7
RICHARD D. MILLER, Jr.,
Petitioner,
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 15-2120 NJV (PR)
vs.
ORDER OF TRANSFER
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
COUNTY,
Respondent.
/
13
14
This is a habeas case filed pro se by a state prisoner. Petitioner seeks to challenge
15
a conviction obtained in the Sacramento County Superior Court. Sacramento County is in
16
the venue of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Petitioner
17
is incarcerated in Oklahoma.
18
Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district
19
of conviction, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); this district is neither. Because petitions challenging a
20
conviction are preferably heard in the district of conviction, Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Laue v.
21
Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968), and petitioner was convicted in the
22
Eastern District, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the
23
Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b).
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 13, 2015.
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?