Bonderer v. Clingman

Filing 30

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/11/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 24 request for copies is GRANTED, and the Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy "Order Referring Case to Post-Screening ADR Project and Staying Case for 90 Days," ECF No. 22 . (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JASON BONDERER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1074 KJN P v. ORDER CLINGMAN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former county jail inmate, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, in this 18 civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a request for a copy of 19 the court’s August 30, 2016 Order Referring Case to Post-Screening ADR Project and Staying 20 Case for 90 Days, ECF No. 22. (See ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff indicates in his request that his copy 21 of the August 30, 2016 order was accidentally discarded. (See id.) Because the August 30, 2016 order contains instructions regarding the confidential 22 23 settlement conference statements that must be filed seven days prior to the scheduled settlement 24 conference, the undersigned directs the Clerk of the Court to send plaintiff another copy of the 25 August 30, 2016 order. However, plaintiff is cautioned that in the future he will be required to 26 pay the standard $0.50 per page in order to obtain additional copies of court documents. 27 //// 28 //// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for copies (ECF NO. 24) 1 2 is granted, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the August 30, 2016 3 “Order Referring Case to Post-Screening ADR Project and Staying Case for 90 Days,” ECF No. 4 22. 5 Dated: October 11, 2016 6 7 8 /bond1074.misc 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?