Food Market Merchandising, Inc. v. California Milk Processor Board

Filing 44

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/24/15. The hearing as to the 38 and 41 Motions to Dismiss is reset for 10/8/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP 1 THOMAS S. KNOX (SBN 73384) STEPHEN J. BYERS (SBN 245607) 2 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1125 Sacramento, CA 95814 3 Telephone: (916) 498-9911 Facsimile: (916) 498-9991 4 Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant CALIFORNIA 5 MILK PROCESSOR BOARD 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 TELE: (916) 498-9911 FAX: (916) 498-9991 KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP 300 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1125, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 FOOD MARKET MERCHANDISING, INC., 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 CALIFORNIA MILK PROCESSOR BOARD, 14 15 CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01083-TLN-CKD STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS OF CALIFORNIA MILK PROCESSOR BOARD Defendant. 16 17 CALIFORNIA MILK PROCESSOR BOARD, 18 Counterclaimant, 19 v. 20 FOOD MARKET MERCHANDISING, INC.; 21 MAGIC STRAWS, LLC; REACH COMPANIES, LLC; and JON TOLLEFSON 22 23 Counterdefendants. 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS OF CALIFORNIA MILK PROCESSOR BOARD INTRODUCTION 1 2 Pursuant to Rule 230(f) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern 3 District of California, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant FOOD MARKET MERCHANDISING, INC., 5 (collectively, “Counterdefendants”), and Defendant/Counterclaimant CALIFORNIA MILK 6 PROCESSOR BOARD, an instrumentality existing under the laws of the State of California and the 7 regulations promulgated by the California Department of Food and Agriculture (“CMPB”) 8 (collectively, the “Parties”) would like to continue the hearings on (1) the Motion of Counterdefendant 9 TELE: (916) 498-9911 FAX: (916) 498-9991 KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP 300 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1125, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 4 Counterdefendants MAGIC STRAWS, LLC, REACH COMPANIES, LLC, JON TOLLEFSON 10 Magic Straws, LLC to Dismiss California Milk Processor Board’s Counterclaims and (2) the Motion of 11 Counterdefendants Food Market Merchandising, Inc., Reach Companies, LLC, and Jon Tollefson to 12 Dismiss California Milk Processor Board’s Counterclaims. Both Motions are presently set for 13 14 September 24, 2015. The Parties would like to continue both Motions to October 8, 2015, in Courtroom 2, 15th floor, of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. 15 16 The Parties believe these continuances are necessary to give CMPB sufficient time to complete 17 its draft Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims to address the alleged deficiencies raised by both 18 Motions to Dismiss and to thereafter give Counterdefendants sufficient time to review the draft Second 19 Amended Answer and Counterclaims before deciding whether to stipulate to allow CMPB to file its 20 Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims subject to the Counterdefendants’ reservation of rights to 21 file a motion to dismiss all or part of the Second Amended Counterclaim. 22 . 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS OF CALIFORNIA MILK PROCESSOR BOARD STIPULATION 1 2 The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate that the hearings on (1) 3 the Motion of Counterdefendant Magic Straws, LLC to Dismiss California Milk Processor Board’s 4 Counterclaims and (2) the Motion of Counterdefendants Food Market Merchandising, Inc., Reach 9 Dated: August 18, 2015 TELE: (916) 498-9911 FAX: (916) 498-9991 KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP 300 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1125, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 5 Companies, LLC, and Jon Tollefson to Dismiss California Milk Processor Board’s Counterclaims, 6 presently set for September 24, 2015, be continued to October 8, 2015, in Courtroom 2, 15th floor, of 7 the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. 8 10 KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP By: /s/ STEPHEN J. BYERS, Attorneys for CALIFORNIA MILK PROCESSOR BOARD 11 12 13 Dated: August 18, 2015 14 PETER E. GLICK, ATTORNEY AT LAW By: /s/ (as authorized on 8/18/15) PETER E. GLICK, Attorney for Magic Straws, LLC 15 16 17 Dated: August 18, 2015 18 19 20 21 WEINTRAUB TOBIN CHEDIAK COLEMAN GRODIN Law Corporation By: /s/ (as authorized on 8/18/15) DALE C. CAMPBELL, Attorneys for Food Market Merchandising, Inc., Reach Companies, LLC and Jon Tollefson 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS OF CALIFORNIA MILK PROCESSOR BOARD ORDER 1 2 Upon consideration of the Parties’ “Stipulation to Continue Hearings on Motions to Dismiss 3 4 First Amended Answer and Counterclaims of California Milk Processor Board” and finding that good 5 cause is shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the Parties’ request is GRANTED. 6 It is further ORDERED that the hearings on (1) the Motion of Counterdefendant Magic Straws, 7 LLC to Dismiss California Milk Processor Board’s Counterclaims and (2) the Motion of 9 TELE: (916) 498-9911 FAX: (916) 498-9991 KNOX, LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP 300 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1125, SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 8 Counterdefendants Food Market Merchandising, Inc., Reach Companies, LLC, and Jon Tollefson to Dismiss California Milk Processor Board’s Counterclaims, presently set for September 24, 2015, are 10 11 12 13 continued to October 8, 2015, in Courtroom 2, 15th floor, of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 Dated: August 24, 2015 16 17 18 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARINGS ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS OF CALIFORNIA MILK PROCESSOR BOARD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?