Food Market Merchandising, Inc. v. California Milk Processor Board
Filing
93
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/25/2018 APPROVING 92 Stipulation and GRANTING the parties' request. Magic Straws, LLC shall have up to and including 7/25/2018, in which to respond or otherwise plead to Counterclaimant's Third Amended Answer and Counterclaim. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
PETER E. GLICK, State Bar No. 127979
Attorney at Law
1722 Third Street, Suite 201
Sacramento, California 95811
Telephone: 916.448.6182
Facsimile:
916.448.2434
Attorneys for Counterdefendant
MAGIC STRAWS, LLC
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FOOD MARKET MERCHANDISING, INC.,
12
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
vs.
14
CALIFORNIA MILK PROCESSOR BOARD,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM
20
Case No. 2:15-cv-01083-TLN-CKD
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR
COUNTERDEFENDANT MAGIC STRAWS,
LLC TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED
ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM BY
26 DAYS; AND ORDER
[F.R.C.P., Rule 6 and Local Rule 144]
Third Amended Answer and Counterclaim
Served: June 15, 2018
Current Response Date: June 29, 2018
New Response Date: July 25, 2018
21
22
Pursuant to Local Rule 144, counterdefendant Magic Straws, LLC (“Magic Straws”), and
23
defendant and counterclaimant California Milk Processor Board (“Counterclaimant”), by and
24
through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate that:
25
1.
on May 31, 2018, the Court issued its Order granting in part and denying in part
26
the motion of plaintiff and counterdefendant Food Market Merchandising, Inc. and
27
counterdefendants Jon Tollefson, Reach Companies, LLC, and Magic Straws to dismiss
28
{2449914.DOCX;}
1
Stipulation Extending Time for Magic Straws LLC to
Respond to Third Amended Answer and
Counterclaim
by 26 Days; and Order
1
2
Counterclaimant’s Second Amended Counterclaim;
2.
on June 14, 2018, counsel for Magic Straws, Peter E. Glick, served a Notice of
3
Unavailability advising all parties that he is unavailable during the period beginning June 10,
4
2018 through July 10, 2018;
5
6
7
3.
on June 15, 2018, Counterclaimant filed and served its Third Amended Answer
and Counterclaim;
4.
the time for Magic Straws to respond, or otherwise plead, to the Third Amended
8
Answer and Counterclaim shall be extended twenty-six (26) days from the current date of
9
June 29, 2018, to July 25, 2018; and
10
11
5.
this is the first such extension of time to respond or otherwise plead to the Third
Amended Answer and Counterclaim.
12
13
14
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: June 19, 2018
15
LAW OFFICE OF PETER E. GLICK
By:
/s/ Peter E. Glick
Peter E. Glick
State Bar No. 127979
Attorneys for Counterdefendant Magic Straws, LLC
16
17
18
19
Dated: June 19, 2018
20
KNOX LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP
By:
/s/ Stephen J. Byers
Stephen J. Byers
State Bar No. 245607
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
California Milk Processor Board
21
22
23
ORDER
24
Upon consideration of the parties’ Stipulation Extending Time for Counterdefendant
25
Magic Straws, LLC to Respond or Otherwise Plead to the Third Amended Answer and
26
Counterclaim, and finding that good cause is shown, it is hereby
27
ORDERED that the parties’ request be and is GRANTED.
28
{2449914.DOCX;}
2
Stipulation Extending Time for Magic Straws LLC to
Respond to Third Amended Answer and
Counterclaim
by 26 Days; and Order
1
It is further
2
ORDERED that counterdefendant Magic Straws, LLC shall have an extension of time,
3
up to and including July 25, 2018, in which to respond or otherwise plead to Counterclaimant’s
4
Third Amended Answer and Counterclaim.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: June 25, 2018
8
9
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{2449914.DOCX;}
3
Stipulation Extending Time for Magic Straws LLC to
Respond to Third Amended Answer and
Counterclaim
by 26 Days; and Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?