Food Market Merchandising, Inc. v. California Milk Processor Board

Filing 93

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/25/2018 APPROVING 92 Stipulation and GRANTING the parties' request. Magic Straws, LLC shall have up to and including 7/25/2018, in which to respond or otherwise plead to Counterclaimant's Third Amended Answer and Counterclaim. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 PETER E. GLICK, State Bar No. 127979 Attorney at Law 1722 Third Street, Suite 201 Sacramento, California 95811 Telephone: 916.448.6182 Facsimile: 916.448.2434 Attorneys for Counterdefendant MAGIC STRAWS, LLC 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FOOD MARKET MERCHANDISING, INC., 12 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. 14 CALIFORNIA MILK PROCESSOR BOARD, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM 20 Case No. 2:15-cv-01083-TLN-CKD STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR COUNTERDEFENDANT MAGIC STRAWS, LLC TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM BY 26 DAYS; AND ORDER [F.R.C.P., Rule 6 and Local Rule 144] Third Amended Answer and Counterclaim Served: June 15, 2018 Current Response Date: June 29, 2018 New Response Date: July 25, 2018 21 22 Pursuant to Local Rule 144, counterdefendant Magic Straws, LLC (“Magic Straws”), and 23 defendant and counterclaimant California Milk Processor Board (“Counterclaimant”), by and 24 through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate that: 25 1. on May 31, 2018, the Court issued its Order granting in part and denying in part 26 the motion of plaintiff and counterdefendant Food Market Merchandising, Inc. and 27 counterdefendants Jon Tollefson, Reach Companies, LLC, and Magic Straws to dismiss 28 {2449914.DOCX;} 1 Stipulation Extending Time for Magic Straws LLC to Respond to Third Amended Answer and Counterclaim by 26 Days; and Order 1 2 Counterclaimant’s Second Amended Counterclaim; 2. on June 14, 2018, counsel for Magic Straws, Peter E. Glick, served a Notice of 3 Unavailability advising all parties that he is unavailable during the period beginning June 10, 4 2018 through July 10, 2018; 5 6 7 3. on June 15, 2018, Counterclaimant filed and served its Third Amended Answer and Counterclaim; 4. the time for Magic Straws to respond, or otherwise plead, to the Third Amended 8 Answer and Counterclaim shall be extended twenty-six (26) days from the current date of 9 June 29, 2018, to July 25, 2018; and 10 11 5. this is the first such extension of time to respond or otherwise plead to the Third Amended Answer and Counterclaim. 12 13 14 Respectfully submitted, Dated: June 19, 2018 15 LAW OFFICE OF PETER E. GLICK By: /s/ Peter E. Glick Peter E. Glick State Bar No. 127979 Attorneys for Counterdefendant Magic Straws, LLC 16 17 18 19 Dated: June 19, 2018 20 KNOX LEMMON & ANAPOLSKY, LLP By: /s/ Stephen J. Byers Stephen J. Byers State Bar No. 245607 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant California Milk Processor Board 21 22 23 ORDER 24 Upon consideration of the parties’ Stipulation Extending Time for Counterdefendant 25 Magic Straws, LLC to Respond or Otherwise Plead to the Third Amended Answer and 26 Counterclaim, and finding that good cause is shown, it is hereby 27 ORDERED that the parties’ request be and is GRANTED. 28 {2449914.DOCX;} 2 Stipulation Extending Time for Magic Straws LLC to Respond to Third Amended Answer and Counterclaim by 26 Days; and Order 1 It is further 2 ORDERED that counterdefendant Magic Straws, LLC shall have an extension of time, 3 up to and including July 25, 2018, in which to respond or otherwise plead to Counterclaimant’s 4 Third Amended Answer and Counterclaim. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: June 25, 2018 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {2449914.DOCX;} 3 Stipulation Extending Time for Magic Straws LLC to Respond to Third Amended Answer and Counterclaim by 26 Days; and Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?