Kwark v. Rackley

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/28/15 ORDERING that this case is TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROYCE SUNG KWARK, 12 No. 2:15-cv-1085 CKD P Petitioner, 13 v. 14 RON RACKLEY, 15 ORDER Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ 17 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. The application attacks a conviction issued by the Superior Court of California, County of 19 20 Los Angeles. While both this court and the United States District Court in the district where 21 petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 22 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner’s 23 application are more readily available in Los Angeles County. Id. at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. § 24 2241(d). 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is 2 transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 3 Dated: May 28, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 2/kly kwar1085.108 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?