Kwark v. Rackley
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/28/15 ORDERING that this case is TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROYCE SUNG KWARK,
12
No. 2:15-cv-1085 CKD P
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
RON RACKLEY,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ
17
18
of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.
The application attacks a conviction issued by the Superior Court of California, County of
19
20
Los Angeles. While both this court and the United States District Court in the district where
21
petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S.
22
484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner’s
23
application are more readily available in Los Angeles County. Id. at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. §
24
2241(d).
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is
2
transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
3
Dated: May 28, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
2/kly
kwar1085.108
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?