Wills v. Ferrara, et al.

Filing 10

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/07/16 recommending that this action be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHARLES ROBERT WILLS,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-1091-TLN-EFB P (TEMP)

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TOM FERRARA, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

A recent notice from the court was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by

18

the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which

19

requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More

20

than sixty-three days have passed since the postal service returned the court order, and plaintiff

21

has failed to notify the court of a current address. Id.

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

23

plaintiff’s failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rule 183(b);

24

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

25

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

27

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

28

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
1

1

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

3

(9th Cir. 1991).

4

DATED: January 7, 2016.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2