Camp Richardson Resort, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company

Filing 30

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 03/22/16 ORDERING the the hearing on the 23 Motion to Dismiss is RESET for 5/19/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley; the briefing deadlines are extended coexistent with the continued hearing date. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JAMES J. BANKS (SBN 119525) jbanks@bw-firm.com ROBERTA LINDSEY SCOTT (SBN 117023) rlscott@bw-firm.com BANKS & WATSON 901 F Street, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95814-2403 (916) 325-1000 (916) 325-1004 (facsimile) Attorneys for Plaintiff CAMP RICHARDSON RESORT, INC. 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 CAMP RICHARDSON RESORT, INC., Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 15 PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, 16 Defendant. Case No.: 2:15-CV-01101-TLN-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RELATED BRIEFING DEADLINES [L.R. 230(f), 143, 144] Hon. Judge Troy Nunley 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff Camp Richardson Resort, Inc. (“CRR”) and defendant Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company (“Philadelphia”) through their respective counsel stipulate as follows: 21 WHEREAS, on February 16, 2016, Philadelphia filed a Motion to Dismiss CRR’s First 22 Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6) and set a hearing on the 23 motion for April 7, 2016. CRR must file an opposition to the motion on or before March 24, 2016; 24 WHEREAS, Banks & Watson, counsel of record to Camp Richardson Resort, Inc., is counsel of 25 record for a party in an arbitration pending before the Hon. Richard Gilbert. Judge Gilbert issued a 26 scheduling order on March 8, 2016 with multiple briefing deadlines and hearings from March and 27 through early April 2016, which conflict with the opposition deadline in the instant motion. This coupled 28 with other filing deadlines caused CRR’s counsel to seek an extension of time to oppose Philadelphia’s 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 1 2 3 pending Motion to Dismiss; WHEREAS, counsel for the parties stipulate that the hearing on Philadelphia’s Motion to Dismiss can be continued to May 19, 2016; 4 WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation, Philadelphia sought and was granted a first extension to 5 respond to CRR’s complaint in June 2015 and a second extension of time to respond to CRR’s complaint 6 in July 2015; 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation, CRR sought and was granted an extension of time to file a 8 First Amended Complaint in December 2015, and Philadelphia sought and was granted an extension to 9 file a response to the First Amended Complaint in January 2016; and 10 11 WHEREAS, this is the first extension of time that CRR has requested to oppose Philadelphia’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. 12 THEREFORE, CRR and Philadelphia stipulate that, subject to this Court’s order, the hearing on 13 Philadelphia’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Compliant be continued to May 19, 2016 at 2:00 14 p.m., and that the briefing deadlines be extended coexistent with the continued hearing date pursuant to 15 Eastern District Local Rule 230(f), 143 and 144. 16 17 Dated: March 18, 2016 BANKS & WATSON 18 By: 19 20 21 Dated: March 18, 2016 /s/ ROBERTA LINDSEY SCOTT Attorneys for Plaintiff CAMP RICHARDSON RESORT, INC. NIELSEN, HALEY & ABBOTT LLP 22 By: 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 /s/ DANIEL N. KATIBAH Attorneys for Defendant PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO. Dated: March 22, 2016 27 28 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?