Russi v. Vang

Filing 5

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/21/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ALFREDO RUSSI,

12

No. 2:15-cv-1130 KJN P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

T. VANG, et al.,

15

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.

16
17

By an order filed June 2, 2015, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit

18

and a certified trust account statement within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so

19

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now

20

expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed a completed in

21

forma pauperis affidavit on the form used by this district or a certified trust account statement.

22
23

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is
directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

24

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

25

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

27

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

28

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
1

1

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the

2

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

3

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

4

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

5

Dated: July 21, 2015

6
7
/russ1130.fifp

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2