Graves v. United States Marshall Office et al

Filing 10

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/4/2017 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute; REFERRING this matter to Judge William B. Shubb; ORDERING that any objections be filed within fourteen days. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

PETER GRAVES,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-1135-WBS-EFB PS

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

UNITED STATES MARSHALL OFFICE,
et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On February 24, 2017, the assigned district judge dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for

18
19

failure to state a claim, and granted him 20 days to file an amended complaint. The deadline has

20

passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.
Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

21
22

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110.

23

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

24

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

25

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

26

with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

27

and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right

28

/////
1

1

to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998);

2

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

DATED: April 4, 2017.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2