Anderson v. Virga et al

Filing 102

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/22/19 ADOPTING 96 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; DENYING 80 Motion for Summary Judgment; REFERRING this matter back to the assigned Magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ERIC ZACHARY ANDERSON, 11 12 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1148-KJM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER TIM VIRGA, et al., Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 18 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On October 11, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 20 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 26 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 27 Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 28 the record and by the proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 11, 2018, are adopted in full; 3 2. The April 16, 2018 motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 80), brought by 4 5 defendants Meier, Riley, and Boe, is DENIED; and 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 6 proceedings. 7 DATED: February 22, 2019. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?