Anderson v. Virga et al

Filing 69

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/18/2017 GRANTING 68 Request. Defendants Riley, F. Boe, and Meier shall have until 1/15/2018, to respond to Plaintiff's 1st Set of Requests for Document Production, 1st Set of Requests for Admissions, and 1st Set of Interrogatories; and Plaintiff may file any motion to compel based on these responses, if needed, no later than 30 days after receipt of the discovery responses. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERIC ZACHARY ANDERSON, Case No. 2:15-cv-1148-KJM-EFB (P) 12 13 v. 14 15 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S DISCOVERY REQUESTS TIM VIRGA, et al., Judge: The Hon. Edmund F. Brennan Defendants. Trial Date: N/A Action Filed: 5/16/2015 16 17 18 Defendants S. Riley, F. Boe, and R. Meier have requested a thirty-day extension of time to 19 comply with the Court’s order directing them to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests no later 20 than December 15, 2017 (ECF No. 64). Good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY 21 ORDERED that: 1. 22 Defendants S. Riley, F. Boe, and R. Meier’s request for an extension of time is GRANTED; 23 2. 24 Defendants shall have until January 15, 2018, to respond to Plaintiff’s First Set of 25 Requests for Document Production, First Set of Requests for Admissions, and First 26 Set of Interrogatories; and, 27 /// 28 /// 1 [Proposed] Order re: Ext. Time (2:15-cv-1148-KJM-EFB (P)) 1 2 3 3. Plaintiff may file any motion to compel based on these responses, if needed, no later than thirty days after receipt of the discovery responses. Dated: December 18, 2017. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [Proposed] Order re: Ext. Time (2:15-cv-1148-KJM-EFB (P))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?