Williams v. Baker et al

Filing 60

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/01/16 ordering that defendants' requests 56 , 57 are granted in part and denied in part as follows: All court orders regarding the deadlines for serving requests for discovery and provi ding responses thereto remain in effect: A. The deadline for serving discovery requests passed on July 18, 2016; no party is granted an extension of time serve additional requests for discovery. B. Defendant Baker and Ramirezs responses to plaintiffs request for production of documents must be served upon plaintiff no later than September 5, 2016. Any motion to compel regarding those responses shall be filed by plaintiff no later than October 1, 2016. C. All of plaintiffs responses to any disco very request shall be served no later than September 10, 2016. The following deadlines currently in effect are modified as follows: A. The deadline for filing any motion to compel regarding plaintiffs responses to any request for discovery is stayed until further notice from the court. B. The deadline for filing a motion for summary judgment, other than the motion concerning plaintiffs alleged failure to exhaust administrative remedies currently before the court, is stayed until further notice from the court. C. The September 16, 2016 date for the close of discovery is vacated. That date will be reset, if appropriate, after resolution of the pending motion for summary judgment. All other requests made by defendants in their requests for extensions of time (ECF No. 56 & 57 ) are denied. (Plummer, M) Modified on 9/1/2016 (Plummer, M).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DONALD WILLIAMS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:15-cv-1155 MCE CKD P

v.

ORDER

E. BAKER,

15

Defendants.

16
Defendants have requested that certain deadlines identified in the courts’ May 27, 2016

17
18

scheduling order be extended. Good cause appearing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

19

defendants’ requests are granted in part, and denied in part as follows:
1. All court orders regarding the deadlines for serving requests for discovery and

20
21

providing responses thereto remain in effect:

22

A. The deadline for serving discovery requests passed on July 18, 2016; no

23

party is granted an extension of time serve additional requests for discovery.

24

B. Defendant Baker and Ramirez’s responses to plaintiff’s request for production

25

of documents must be served upon plaintiff no later than September 5, 2016. Any

26

motion to compel regarding those responses shall be filed by plaintiff no later than

27

October 1, 2016.

28

/////
1

1

C. All of plaintiff’s responses to any discovery request shall be

2

served no later than September 10, 2016.

3

2. The following deadlines currently in effect are modified as follows:

4

A. The deadline for filing any motion to compel regarding plaintiff’s responses to

5

any request for discovery is stayed until further notice from the court.

6

B. The deadline for filing a motion for summary judgment, other than the motion

7

concerning plaintiff’s alleged failure to exhaust administrative remedies currently

8

before the court, is stayed until further notice from the court.

9

C. The September 16, 2016 date for the close of discovery is vacated. That date

10

will be reset, if appropriate, after resolution of the pending motion for summary

11

judgment.

12

3. All other requests made by defendants in their requests for extensions of time (ECF

13

No. 56 & 57) are denied.

14

Dated: September 1, 2016

15
16

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17
18
19

1
will1155.mod

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2