Williams v. Baker et al

Filing 73

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/16/2016 DENYING the 62 motion to compel. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DONALD WILLIAMS,

12

No. 2:15-cv-1155 MCE CKD P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

E. BAKER, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil

18

rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 19, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion to compel

19

concerning requests for production of documents served upon defendants Baker and Ramirez.

20

The requests for production at issue, attached to plaintiff’s motion, contain 23 requests. Plaintiff

21

fails to identify which responses to those requests he deems objectionable. Because plaintiff has

22

failed to demonstrate that he is entitled to further responses or anything else with respect to his

23

requests for production of documents, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that his motion to compel

24

(ECF No. 62) is denied.

25

Dated: November 16, 2016

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

1/will1155.mtc