Mitchell v. Snowden et al
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/27/2017 SCHEDULING a Status Conference on Wednesday, 1/17/2018, at 10:00 AM, in Courtroom 26 (AC), before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL J. MITCHELL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:15-cv-1167 TLN AC P
ORDER
SNOWDEN, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
This case is before this court on remand from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On
18
November 1, 2017, the Court of Appeals vacated this court’s judgment dismissing this case on
19
statute of limitations grounds, and remanded for further proceedings on the question whether
20
plaintiff Mitchell’s mental illness and multiple prison transfers warrant equitable tolling. See
21
ECF No. 43 (Ninth Circuit’s Memorandum opinion in Case No. 16-16848). The Court of
22
Appeals affirmed this court’s finding that plaintiff is not entitled to statutory tolling. The Court of
23
Appeals also directed this court to “reevaluate whether counsel should be appointed in light of
24
Mitchell’s mental illness and medical conditions.” Id. at 2. The Court of Appeals’ Mandate
25
issued on November 24, 2017.
26
By separate order, this court has appointed attorney Donald A. Lancaster, Jr. to represent
27
plaintiff in further proceedings before this court. Defendants continue to be represented by the
28
Office of the California Attorney General.
1
In light of the procedural posture of the case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. A status conference is scheduled before the undersigned on Wednesday, January 17,
3
2018, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 26. Counsel for the parties may appear telephonically and,
4
if they intend to do so, shall timely make appropriate arrangements with the undersigned’s
5
Courtroom Deputy, Valerie Callen, at 916-930-4199.
6
2. At the status conference, counsel shall be prepared to address the scope and timing of
7
supplemental briefing on the equitable tolling issue, and whether an evidentiary hearing is
8
appropriate.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
DATED: November 27, 2017
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?