Banzet v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/22/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 26 request for an extension of time is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file any objections to the court's 8/30/2016 findings and recommendations on or before 9/28/2016. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LORI LOUISE BANZET, 11 12 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-1173-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 15 16 17 Plaintiff seeks an extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations 18 issued on August 30, 2016, recommending that her motion for summary judgment be denied and 19 the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment be granted.1 ECF No. 26. Plaintiff 20 contends that an extension is necessary due to a delay in receiving the court’s findings and 21 recommendations, which she claims she did not receive until September 12, 2016. 22 In light of plaintiff’s representation, the court will grant a short extension of time, and 23 permit plaintiff to file any objections to the findings and recommendations on or before 24 September 28, 2016. This extension will give plaintiff 16 days from the date she purportedly 25 received the court’s findings and recommendations, which exceeds the 14-day objection period 26 initially provided. 27 28 1 This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 1 Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for an extension of time (ECF No. 26) is granted, and 2 plaintiff may file any objections to the court’s August 30, 2016 findings and recommendations on 3 or before September 28, 2016. 4 DATED: September 22, 2016. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?