Barahona v. Arnold

Filing 24

USCA ORDER issued by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on 1/12/2017 DENYING the 22 Petition for Writ of Mandamus without prejudice to the filing of a new petition if the district court has not ruled on petitioner's pending motion for recusal within 90 days; DENYING the pending Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis as moot. (Michel, G.)

FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: RONNIE MAURICIO
BARAHONA.
______________________________
RONNIE MAURICIO BARAHONA,

No.

JAN 12 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

16-73503

D.C. No.
2:15-cv-01180-KJM-DB
Eastern District of California,
Sacramento

Petitioner,
v.

ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO,
Respondent,
ERIC ARNOLD, Acting Warden,
Real Party in Interest.

Before: LEAVY, SILVERMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice to the filing
of a new petition if the district court has not ruled on petitioner’s pending motion
for recusal within 90 days.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot.
DENIED.
SLL/MOATT