Von Staich v. California Board of Parole Hearings et al
Filing
49
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/19/2017 ORDERING the 44 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Plaintiff's 23 motion for sanctions is DENIED. Plaintiff's 28 , 38 motions for summary adjudication and 34 motion for judicial notice are DENIED without prejudice as premature. The 46 findings and recommendations are ADOPTED in full and plaintiff's 40 Motion for Injunctive Relief is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
IVAN VON STAICH,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-1182 JAM DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE
HEARINGS, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
19
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
20
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On August 16 and August 29, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and
22
recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all
23
parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen
24
days. Neither party has filed objections to either one of the findings and recommendations.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
26
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27
court finds both findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
28
analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 16, 2017 (ECF No. 44) are adopted in
3
full;
4
a. Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 23) is denied; and
5
b. Plaintiff’s motions for summary adjudication (ECF Nos. 28, 38) and motion for
6
7
8
9
judicial notice (ECF No. 34) are denied without prejudice as premature.
2. The findings and recommendations filed August 29, 2017 (ECF No. 46) are adopted in
full and plaintiff’s July 24, 2017 Motion for Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 40) is denied.
DATED: 12/19/2017
10
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
DLB:9
stai1182.801(2)
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?