Alvarado v. People of The State of California
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/24/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of Court is directed to: (a) redesignate the undersigneds findings and recommendations filed June 15, 2015 as an order; and (b) withdraw the assignment of a district judge to this action; and this action is summarily dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID ALVARADO,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:15-cv-1197 MCE CKD P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,
Respondent.
17
18
On June 15, 2015, the undersigned magistrate judge recommended that the petition be
19
summarily dismissed, and directed the assignment of a district judge to review this
20
recommendation. (ECF No. 9.) Since that time, petitioner has filed a notice of consent to the
21
jurisdiction of the undersigned magistrate judge for all purposes. 28 U.S.C. §636(c); Local Rule
22
302. (ECF No. 10.) As no respondent has been served, petitioner is the only party to this action.
23
Having reviewed the docket, the undersigned concludes there is no basis for modifying its prior
24
conclusion that this action should be dismissed.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. The Clerk of Court is directed to: (a) redesignate the undersigned’s findings and
27
recommendations filed June 15, 2015 as an order; and (b) withdraw the assignment of a district
28
judge to this action; and
1
1
2. For the reasons stated in this court’s order filed June 15, 2015, this action is summarily
2
dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254.
3
Dated: June 24, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2 / alva1197.cb
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?