Protzel v. Alaw et al
Filing
7
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/23/2015 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The court's 7/29/2015, hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss is VACATED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MONA PROTZEL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-01199-MCE-AC
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
ALAW, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On June 18,
17
18
2015, defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (for itself and as receiver for defendant
19
Washington Mutual Bank) and California Reconveyance Company (collectively “defendants”)
20
filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, with a hearing scheduled for July 29, 2015. ECF
21
No. 6. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), plaintiff was required to file an opposition or notice of
22
non-opposition by July 15, 2015. Plaintiff has yet to file either an opposition or notice of non-
23
opposition.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1. Plaintiff shall show cause in writing within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order
25
26
why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b)
27
for failure to prosecute; and
28
////
1
1
2
2. The court’s July 29, 2015, hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss is VACATED.
DATED: July 23, 2015
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?