Protzel v. Alaw et al

Filing 7

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/23/2015 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The court's 7/29/2015, hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss is VACATED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONA PROTZEL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-01199-MCE-AC v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ALAW, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On June 18, 17 18 2015, defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (for itself and as receiver for defendant 19 Washington Mutual Bank) and California Reconveyance Company (collectively “defendants”) 20 filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, with a hearing scheduled for July 29, 2015. ECF 21 No. 6. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), plaintiff was required to file an opposition or notice of 22 non-opposition by July 15, 2015. Plaintiff has yet to file either an opposition or notice of non- 23 opposition. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff shall show cause in writing within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order 25 26 why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) 27 for failure to prosecute; and 28 //// 1 1 2 2. The court’s July 29, 2015, hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss is VACATED. DATED: July 23, 2015 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?