Androshchuk v. Biter
Filing
28
ORDER adopting in full 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 3/14/17. Petitioner's 17 motion for stay is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
EDUARD VLADIMIROV
ANDROSHCHUK,
Petitioner,
13
ORDER
v.
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-1204 MCE AC P
MARTIN BITER, Warden,
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
17
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 18, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 20. Neither
23
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 18, 2016 (ECF No. 20), are
3
4
ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2. Petitioner’s motion for stay (ECF No. 17) is DENIED.
5
6
Dated: March 14, 2017
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?