Alvarez Zardain v. IPACPA US, Inc.

Filing 45

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/6/2017 ORDERING Plaintiff's 37 Motion Hearing on Relief From Pretrial Scheduling Order Reset for 2/9/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before District Judge Morrison C. England Jr.; Opposition due by 1/20/2017; and Replies due by 1/27/2017. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DOWNEY BRAND LLP JAMIE P. DREHER (Bar No. 209380) CHRISTOPHER B. BURTON (Bar No. 296582) 621 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814-4731 Telephone: (916) 444-1000 Facsimile: (916) 444-2100 jdreher@downeybrand.com cburton@downeybrand.com Attorneys for Plaintiff ENRIQUE ALVAREZ ZARDAIN 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ENRIQUE ALVAREZ ZARDAIN, an individual, DOWNEY BRAND LLP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01207-MCE-EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES ASSOCIATED WITH MOTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 14 15 IPACPA US, INC., a Delaware corporation, TRC HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1-20, 16 Defendants. Date: Time: Dept.: Judge: January 12, 2017 2:00 p.m. Courtroom 7 Hon. Morrison C. England 17 RECITALS 18 A. 19 On October 18, 2016, Plaintiff Enrique Alvarez Zardain (“Plaintiff”) filed his 20 Motion Seeking Relief From Pretrial Scheduling Order (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 37.) The 21 Motion was originally set for hearing on December 1, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. B. 22 On November 15, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Stipulation and Order to Continue 23 Hearing on Motion Seeking Relief From Pretrial Scheduling Order, seeking to continue the 24 hearing on the Motion to December 15, 2016. (Dkt. No. 39.) On November 17, 2016, the Court 25 entered the Order continuing the hearing to December 15, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. (Dkt. No. 40.) C. 26 On December 1, 2016, Plaintiff filed a further Stipulation and Order to Continue 27 Hearing on Motion Seeking Relief From Pretrial Scheduling Order, seeking to continue the 28 hearing on the Motion to January 12, 2017, and extend the filing deadline for Defendant TRC 1466944.1 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES ASSOCIATED WITH MOTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 1 Holdings, Inc.’s opposition to December 8, 2016, and Plaintiff’s reply to December 15, 2016. 2 (Dkt. No. 41.) 3 D. On December 8, 2016, Plaintiff filed a further Stipulation and Order to Continue 4 Hearing on Motion Seeking Relief From Pretrial Scheduling Order, seeking, once again, to 5 continue the hearing on the Motion to January 12, 2017, but requesting that the associated 6 briefing deadlines be further extended to December 15, 2016 for Defendant TRC Holdings, Inc.’s 7 opposition, and December 22, 2016 for Plaintiff’s reply. (Dkt. No. 42.) The Court has not yet 8 entered an Order granting the stipulation. 9 E. On December 13, 2016, the Court entered its Order on the stipulation filed on December 1, 2016 (Dkt. No. 41), continuing the hearing to January 12, 2017, and extending the 11 filing deadline for Defendant TRC Holdings, Inc.’s opposition to December 8, 2016, and 12 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 10 Plaintiff’s reply to December 15, 2016. (Dkt. No. 43.) 13 F. The parties continue to discuss a settlement that would resolve this action in its 14 entirety and therefore wish to further extend the briefing deadlines associated with the Motion, to 15 avoid incurring additional attorneys’ fees at this time. 16 G. Given that the Court has yet to enter an Order granting the stipulation filed on 17 December 8, 2016 (Dkt. No. 42), this Stipulation is meant to supersede the prior stipulation. The 18 only germane distinction between the current Stipulation and the version filed on December 8, 19 2016 is the stipulated briefing deadlines. 20 STIPULATION 21 22 In accordance with the foregoing stipulation, the dates for filing an opposition and 23 1. Defendant TRC Holdings, Inc.’s opposition to the Motion will be due to be filed 24 on December 22, 2016, and Plaintiff’s reply will be due to be filed on December 29, 2016. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1466944.1 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES ASSOCIATED WITH MOTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 1 DATED: December 15, 2016 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Christopher B. Burton JAMIE P. DREHER CHRISTOPHER B. BURTON Attorneys for Plaintiff Enrique Alvarez Zardain 4 5 6 7 DATED: December 15, 2016 HILL RIVKINS BROWN & ASSOCIATES 8 By: /s/ Adam C. Brown (as authorized on 12-15-16) ADAM C. BROWN Attorneys for Defendant TRC Holdings, Inc. 9 10 11 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 12 13 ORDER 14 The deadlines for filing an opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion Seeking Relief from 15 Scheduling Order [37] is extended from December 8, 2016 to January 20, 2017, and the last day 16 to submit a reply shall be continued from December 22, 2016 to January 27, 2017. While the 17 Court recognizes those dates are beyond those proposed in the foregoing stipulation, they are 18 consistent with the new hearing date on the Motion, which the Court sua sponte continues from 19 January 12, 2017 to February 9, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom No. 7. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: January 6, 2017 23 24 25 26 27 28 1466944.1 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES ASSOCIATED WITH MOTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?