Hopson v. United Spas Manufacturing Inc., et al
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 02/09/16 ORDERING that, pursuant to the parties' filed consent, the Clerk shall reassign this case to the Honorable Carolyn K. Delaney. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk shall bear case number 2:15-cv-01217-CKD. All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge England are hereby VACATED. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CYNTHIA HOPSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-01217 MCE-CKD
v.
ORDER
UNITED SPAS MANUFACTURING
INCORPORATED dba UNITED SPAS
MANUFACTURING, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has consented to proceed before
18
19
a United States Magistrate Judge as stated in their Joint Status Report (ECF No. 9).
20
See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(c). According to E.D. Cal. R. 305, both the district court judge
21
assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the
22
magistrate judge.
The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-
23
24
captioned case be assigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further
25
proceedings and entry of final judgment.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the
2
Honorable Carolyn K. Delaney. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter
3
filed with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number 2:15-cv-01217-CKD. All
4
currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge England are hereby VACATED.
5
Dated: February 9, 2016
6
7
8
9
10
11
Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further
proceedings and entry of final judgment.
12
Dated: February 9, 2016
13
14
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?