United States of America v. Ramsey et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/20/15: The Court declines to sign the referenced stipulation and proposed order 7 . (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

10
11
12
13

No.

2:15-cv-01236-GEB-AC

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER DECLINING TO SIGN
PROPOSED ORDER THAT IS BASED ON
STIPULATED ENTRY OF JUDGMENT ON
TWO COUNTS IN THE COMPLAINT

FRED CHARLES RAMSEY;
DELLA DICHARRY-RAMSEY; and
GLENN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA;

14

Defendants,

15
16

Plaintiff and Defendants Fred Charles Ramsey and Della

17

Dicharry-Ramsey filed a stipulation and proposed order on August

18

14, 2015, which concerns the resolution of and entry of judgment

19

on Counts I and II in the Complaint. (Stipulation to Judgment,

20

ECF No. 7.) However, neither the stipulation nor the proposed

21

order

22

prescribes in relevant part: “[T]he court may direct entry of a

23

final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or

24

parties only if the court expressly determines that there is no

25

just reason for delay.” Further, it is unclear whether Defendant

26

Glen County opposes any portion of the stipulation and proposed

27

order;

28

Defendant Glen County concerning its terms.

address

the

Federal

stipulation

Rule

does

of

Civil

not

1

Procedure

indicate

the

54(b),

which

position

of

1

Therefore, the Court declines to sign the referenced

2

stipulation and proposed order.

3

Dated:

August 20, 2015

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2