USA v. Estate of Joseph Arleo

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/7/2017 ORDERING that fact discovery and discovery be completed by 10/20/2017; ORDERING that dispositive motions be filed by 12/19/2017 and that such motions be noticed for hearing on 1/16/2018; ORDERING the parties to file a Joint Pretrial Statement by 2/23/2018; CONTINUING the Final Pretrial Conference to 3/2/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez; CONTINUING the Jury Trial to 4/9/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 4 5 6 7 8 ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-1239-JAMPlaintiff, ) KJN ) ORDER v. ) ) ESTATE OF JOSEPH ARLEO, ET AL, ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________) 9 FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, and pursuant to the Stipulation of 10 the parties, the deadlines in the Scheduling Order previously 11 set forth by the Court are revised as follows: 12 Event Current date Proposed new date 14 Fact Discovery cut-off September 15, 2017 October 20, 2017 15 Discovery cut-off September 15, 2017 October 20, 2017 16 Dispositive Motions November 7, 2017 December 19, 2017 17 cut-off 18 Dispositive Motion December 5, 2017 January 16, 2018 January 26, 2018 February 23, 2018 13 19 20 21 22 23 Hearing Joint Pre-Trial Statement Final Pre-Trial March 2, 2018 @ 10 February 2, 2108 Conference a.m. 24 [Proposed] Order (Case No. 2:15-cv-1239-JAM-KJN) 1 1 April 9, 2018 @ 9 Trial March 12, 2018 a.m. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: 9/7/2017 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ The Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge Eastern District of California 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [Proposed] Order (Case No. 2:15-cv-1239-JAM-KJN) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?