Hackert v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 118

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/19/18 GRANTING Cigna's unopposed motion to dismiss this case in full. This resolves ECF No. 114 . With no claims remaining, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN B. HACKERT, M.D. Civ. No. 2:15-cv-01248-KJM-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER v. CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; CIGNA HEALTH CORPORATION; CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF CALIFORNIA, INC.; and DOES 1-10, Defendants. 18 19 20 21 CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; CIGNA HEALTH CORPORATION; CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Counterclaimants, 22 23 24 25 v. JOHN B. HACKERT, M.D., Counterdefendant. 26 27 28 1 1 On March 19, 2018, Counterclaimants Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company, 2 Cigna Health Corporation, and Cigna Healthcare of California, Inc. (collectively “Cigna”) moved 3 to dismiss this case based on the parties’ joint representation that the case has settled. Mot., ECF 4 No. 114, Settlement Notice, ECF No. 12. Cigna attached to its motion (1) a declaration by its 5 counsel indicating counterdefendant Hackert does not oppose dismissal, and (2) a copy of an e- 6 mail from Hackert communicating his non-opposition. ECF No. 114-1. 7 On March 20, 2018, the court also issued an order granting Hackert fourteen days 8 to oppose Cigna’s motion and noting that if Hackert did not file an opposition, the court would 9 grant the motion as unopposed. Order, ECF No. 114. Fourteen days has now lapsed. Hackert 10 11 has filed no opposition. Accordingly, the court GRANTS Cigna’s unopposed motion to dismiss this case in 12 full. This resolves ECF No. 114. With no claims remaining, the Clerk of the Court is 13 DIRECTED to close this case. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 19, 2018. 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?