Hobley v. Baker et al
Filing
81
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/30/2018 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LEON DURELL HOBLEY,
12
No. 2:15-cv-1260 MCE CKD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
E. BAKER, et al.,
15
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. There are two pending motions for summary judgment. On March 21, 2018,
19
plaintiff was ordered to file oppositions or statements of non-opposition within thirty days. In the
20
same order, plaintiff was informed that failure to file oppositions would result in a
21
recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The thirty day
22
period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order.
23
The court notes that the court’s March 21, 2018 order was returned to the court by the
24
U.S. Postal Service. Plaintiff was properly served as it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the
25
court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of
26
documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
27
28
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be
dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
1
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
2
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
3
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
4
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
5
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
6
objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
7
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
8
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
9
Dated: April 30, 2018
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
hob1260.46frs
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?