Daniels v. Fox et al
Filing
40
ORDER ADOPTING 31 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/28/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 23 25 26 Motions for Extraordinary Relief are DENIED. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ZACHARIAH DANIELS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 15-cv-1264 GEB AC P
v.
ORDER
R. FOX, Warden, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil
17
18
rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
19
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On November 29, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 31. Plaintiff has
23
not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 29, 2016, are adopted in full; and
27
28
////
1
1
2. Plaintiff’s motions for extraordinary relief, ECF Nos. 23, 25, and 26 are denied.
2
DATED:
3
Dated: December 28, 2016
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?