Rose v. Borca

Filing 6

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/20/2015 ORDERING the Clerk to appoint a District Judge to this action. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WILLIAM P. ROSE,

12
13
14

No. 2:15-cv-01290 KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER and FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

DANILLE BORCA,

15

Defendant.

16
17

By order filed July 1, 2015, the undersigned ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the

18

court, within thirty days, the USM-285 form necessary to effect service on defendant Danille

19

Borca. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the

20

court’s order.

21
22
23
24
25

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall appoint a
district judge in this action.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

27

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

28

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and
1

1

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time

2

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th

3

Cir. 1991).

4

Dated: August 20, 2015

5
6
/rose1290.fusm

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2