Scott v. Macomber
Filing
27
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/19/18 ORDERING that this matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings consistent with this order. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARCUS SCOTT,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-1292 KJM AC P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
JEFF MACOMBER,
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas
18
corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as
19
provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On July 28, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
21
served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the
23
findings and recommendations.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. The findings and recommendations contain
26
two citations to Boyd v. Newland, 393 F.3d 1008, 1013 (9th Cir. 2004). See ECF No. 23 at 20:23-
27
26 and 21:9-10. The opinion in Boyd was amended on denial of petitions for rehearing and
28
rehearing en banc, see Boyd v. Newland, 455 F.3d 897 (9th Cir. 2006), and the latter opinion was
1
1
amended and superseded by Boyd v. Newland, 467 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir. 2006). Good cause
2
appearing, this matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for consideration of what
3
effect, if any, the subsequent history of Boyd has on the pending findings and recommendations.
4
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is referred back
5
to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings consistent with this order.
6
DATED: April 19, 2018.
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?