Smith v. H.F.D. No. 55, Inc.
Filing
17
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 02/02/16 ORDERING that this case is temporarily STAYED pending the circuit court's decision whetherto grant the petition for a rehearing en banc, and in the event the petition is granted, pending issuance of an en banc opinion. The parties shall notify the court within seven days of any decision in Sakkab. CASE STAYED (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SABRINA SMITH,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:15-cv-01293-KJM-KJN
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
H.F.D. NO. 55, INC., dba J. CREW, a
California corporation; and DOES 1 to100,
inclusive,
Defendant.
17
18
19
On September 3, 2015, the court held a hearing on defendant H.F.D. No. 55, Inc.’s
20
motion to compel arbitration. On September 29, 2015, plaintiff gave notice a Ninth Circuit panel
21
had issued its opinion in Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., 803 F.3d 425 (9th Cir.
22
2015). On October 20, 2015, defendant gave notice the circuit court had granted the appellant an
23
extension of time to respond to the petition for a rehearing en banc in that case. Appellant’s
24
response was filed on January 15, 2016.
25
Because resolution of the issue before the Sakkab court directly concerns that
26
before this court, this case is temporarily STAYED pending the circuit court’s decision whether
27
to grant the petition for a rehearing en banc, and in the event the petition is granted, pending
28
issuance of an en banc opinion. See Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936) (“[T]he
1
1
power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the
2
disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and
3
for litigants.”).
4
The parties shall notify the court within seven days of any decision in Sakkab.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
DATED: February 2, 2016.
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?