Johnson v. Beard
Filing
234
ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 3/29/2024 ADOPTING IN FULL 233 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 229 , 230 Motions for Default Judgment; and DISMISSING this action. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PAUL JOHNSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
BEARD, et al.,
15
No. 2:15-cv-1313 DJC KJN P
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking
18
relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On November 29, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and
21
recommendations herein which were served on all parties, and which contained
22
notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to
23
be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed objections to the findings and
24
recommendations.
25
The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United
26
States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law
27
are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454
28
(9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and
1
1
recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s
2
analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 29, 2023, are adopted
5
in full;
6
2. Plaintiff’s motions for default judgment (ECF Nos. 229, 230) are denied; and
7
3. This action is dismissed.
8
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
March 29, 2024
Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
/john15cv1313.801
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?