Johnson v. Beard

Filing 234

ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 3/29/2024 ADOPTING IN FULL 233 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 229 , 230 Motions for Default Judgment; and DISMISSING this action. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL JOHNSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 BEARD, et al., 15 No. 2:15-cv-1313 DJC KJN P ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking 18 relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On November 29, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 21 recommendations herein which were served on all parties, and which contained 22 notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to 23 be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed objections to the findings and 24 recommendations. 25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 26 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 27 are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 28 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and 1 1 recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s 2 analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 29, 2023, are adopted 5 in full; 6 2. Plaintiff’s motions for default judgment (ECF Nos. 229, 230) are denied; and 7 3. This action is dismissed. 8 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 29, 2024 Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 /john15cv1313.801 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?