Johnson v. Beard

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/17/2019 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted twenty-one days from the date of this order in which to file a second amended complaint. Failure to file a second amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this action. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL DAVID JOHNSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 No. 2:15-cv-1313 TLN KJN P ORDER J.A. BEARD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. 17 18 § 1983. On November 5, 2018, plaintiff was granted thirty days in which to file a second 19 amended complaint that complies with the March 20, 2018 order. On December 20, 2018, the 20 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that it lacked jurisdiction over 21 plaintiff’s appeal because the order challenged was not final or appealable. (ECF No. 31.) In 22 light of the Circuit’s order, plaintiff is granted one final extension of time in which to file a 23 second amended complaint that complies with the March 20, 2018 order. (ECF No. 19.) Failure 24 to file his pleading in response to this order will result in the dismissal of this action. Fed. R. Civ. 25 P. 41(b).1 26 1 Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: 27 28 Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted twenty-one days from 2 the date of this order in which to file a second amended complaint. Failure to file a second 3 amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this action. 4 Dated: January 17, 2019 5 6 /cw/john1313.ext2 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 dismiss the action or any claim against it. Unless the dismissal order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subdivision (b) and any dismissal not under this rule--except one for lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule 19--operates as an adjudication on the merits. 26 27 28 Id. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?