Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/26/16 ORDERING that the request for extension of time is GRANTED; the time for plaintiff to file motion for summary judgment is EXTENDED to 01/26/16. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JESSE S. KAPLAN CSB#103726 5441 Fair Oaks Bl. Ste. C-1 Carmichael, CA 95608 916/488-3030 916/489-9297 fax 4 5 Attorney for Plaintiff ANNABELLE HERNANDEZ 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -o0O0o- 11 12 13 ANNABELLE HERNANDEZ, No. Plaintiff, 14 STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF PLAINTIFF’S TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 16 17 18 19 20 2:15-cv-01322-EFB v. CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. _______________________________________/ 21 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective 23 undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff’s time to file a motion 24 for summary judgment is extended one day to January 26, 2016. 25 This extension is requested because of the nature of the case, involving 900+ pages of 26 27 28 record, two consolidated claims, six consultative evaluations, and seven nonexamining medical opinions. - 1 1 Dated: January 25, 2016 /s/ Jesse S. Kaplan JESSE S. KAPLAN Attorney for Plaintiff 2 3 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Acting Regional Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 5 6 7 8 Dated: January 25, 2016 /s/ per e-mail authorization Theophous Reagans Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant 9 10 11 12 ORDER 13 14 15 16 For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, the requested extension of plaintiff’s time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is extended to January 26, 2016. 17 SO ORDERED. 18 19 Dated: January 26, 2016. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?