Bojescu v. Sacramento Sheriffs Department

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/30/15 DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; Clerk of the Court shall provide plaintiff with another copy of the in forma pauperis application used by this court. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a fully completed in forma pauperis application. Plaintiffs failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN BOJESCU, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-1330 DAD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, the certificate portion of the in forma pauperis application has not 21 been filled out and signed by an authorized jail official. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff 22 will be provided another opportunity to submit a fully completed application to proceed in forma 23 pauperis. 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. Plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied without 26 27 28 prejudice. 2. The Clerk of the Court shall provide plaintiff with another copy of the in forma pauperis application used by this court. 1 1 3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a fully completed 2 in forma pauperis application. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in a 3 recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 4 Dated: June 30, 2015 5 6 7 8 DAD:10/mp boje1330.3c 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?