Norman v. Riaz et al
Filing
21
ORDER adopting 19 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/8/16: Defendant Bodenhamer is dismissed form this action. This action shall proceed only against defendant Dr. Ruiz on plaintiff's Eight Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL J. NORMAN,
12
No. 2:15-cv-1346 GEB AC P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
DR. RIAZ, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On June 10, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 19. Neither party
23
has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed June 10, 2016, are adopted in full;
28
2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 15, is granted in part and denied in part;
1
1
3. Defendant Bodenhamer is dismissed form this action; and
2
4. This action shall proceed only against defendant Dr. Ruiz on plaintiff’s Eight
3
Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs.
4
Dated: July 8, 2016
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?