Norman v. Riaz et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/12/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 26 Motion for Reconsideration and to Vacate Deadlines is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; the undersigned has reconsidered the 21 court's 07/11/16 Order, in light of plaintiff's objections to the 19 magistrate judge's 06/10/16 findings and recommendations, and AFFIRMS the 21 07/11/16 order adopting the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations. Plaintiff's request to vacate deadlines is DENIED as moot. (Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DANIEL J. NORMAN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:15-cv-1346 GEB AC P

v.

ORDER

DR. RIAZ,

15

Defendant.

16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks reconsideration of this court’s order

17
18

filed July 11, 2016, ECF No. 21, and to vacate all deadlines in this case pending such

19

reconsideration. See ECF No. 26.

20

Plaintiff challenges this court’s adoption of the magistrate judge’s June 10, 2016 findings

21

and recommendations, ECF No. 19, without consideration of plaintiff’s objections, ECF No. 20,

22

which were timely signed but belatedly received by the court. In deference to plaintiff’s request,

23

the court has now reviewed the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations in light of

24

plaintiff’s objections. The court finds plaintiff’s objections unpersuasive for the reasons set forth

25

by the magistrate judge. See ECF No. 19 at 10-2. Therefore, the order of this court adopting the

26

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, ECF No. 21, shall remain in effect.

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration and to vacate deadlines, ECF No. 26, is granted

3
4

in part and denied in part;
2. The undersigned has reconsidered the court’s order filed July 11, 2016, in light of

5

plaintiff’s objections to the magistrate judge’s June 10, 2016 findings and recommendations, and

6

affirms the July 11, 2016 order adopting the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations.

7
8

3. Plaintiff’s request to vacate deadlines is denied as moot.
Dated: December 12, 2016

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2